 |
Open procedure |
 |
Restricted procedure |
b) The products involved are manufactured purely for the purpose of research, experiment, study or
development under the conditions stated in the Directive (for supplies only).
c) The works/goods/services can be provided only by a particular tenderer for reasons that are:
 |
Technical |
 |
Artistic |
 |
Connected with the protection of exclusive rights |
d) Extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority and in
accordance with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
e) Additional works/deliveries/services are ordered under the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
f) New works/services, constituting a repetition of existing works/services and ordered in accordance
with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
g)Service contract awarded to the successful candidate or one of them after a design contest.
h) For supplies quoted and purchased on a commodity market.
i) For the purchase of supplies on particularly advantageous terms:
 |
from a supplier which is definitely winding up its business activities |
 |
from the receivers or liquidators of a bankruptcy, an arrangement with creditors or a similar procedure. |
j) All tenders submitted in reply to an open procedure, a restricted procedure or competitive dialogue were irregular or
unacceptable. Only those tenderers were included in the negotiations which have satisfied the qualitative selection criteria.
Other justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a
contract notice in the OJEU:
k) The contract has as its object services listed in Annex B of Directive 2004/18/EC or in Annex XVII B of Directive 2004/17/EC
l) The contract falls outside the scope of application of the relevant directive.
In addition to the box(es) ticked above please explain in a clear and
comprehensive manner why the award of the contract without prior publication of
a contract notice in the OJEU is lawful, stating in any case the relevant facts,
and, as appropriate, the conclusions of law in accordance with the articles in
the relevant Directive (500 words maximum):
In concluding its procurement of an operator of the National Reference Tests (NRT) programme, Ofqual has invoked the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice in accordance with Regulation 14(1)(a)(ii), Public Contracts Regulations 2006 on the basis that:
(a) Ofqual failed to receive suitable tenders under the open procedure originally used for this procurement (OJEU reference 332246-2014 (2014/S 188-332246);
(b) Ofqual has invited to negotiate the contract the single economic operator which submitted a tender during the discontinued open procedure; and;
(c) Ofqual believes that the original terms of the proposed contract offered in the discontinued procedure have not been substantially altered in the negotiated procedure.
The alterations made to the terms of the original draft contract through recourse to the negotiated procedure without notice are summarised as follows:
1. The Supplier is no longer liable for the increase in costs should the precision of +/- 1.5 % not be achieved within the specified sample size. The Supplier is required to achieve a high level of precision with the aim of achieving a level of precision +/-1.5 %. If the Preliminary Reference Tests demonstrate that the precision level is not achievable with the specified sample size, Ofqual and the Supplier will agree whether any changes are required to the precision level and/or sample size in accordance with the change control procedure. Ofqual will bear the cost of any increase to the sample size;
2. The Supplier's liability in respect of claims arising out of/in connection with:
a. the Strategic Design Services and/or Detailed Design & Development Services, is capped at 125 % of the total charges paid/payable in respect of these Services; and
b. the Delivery Services, is limited to an annual cap of 125 % of the charges paid/payable in each 12 months in respect of the Delivery Services; and
c. any wilful default, wilful breach of a fundamental term or wilful repudiatory breach of the Agreement, is capped at 200 % (and not 125 %) of the relevant amount.
3. Amendment to the General Changes in Law provisions such that the Supplier is liable for each General Change in Law up to a limit of 20 000 GBP for the term of the Agreement. The Supplier can retain savings up to the sum of 20 000 GBP in the event that a General Change in Law results in cost reductions;
4. Amendment to the licensing of certain of the Supplier's intellectual property rights during the Term of the Agreement and any Termination Assistance Period with restrictions on rights to sub-license the same;
5. Addition of a new Milestone for an initial group of Test Items to be written during the Strategic Design Services.
6. Variations in charges which will apply if the Supplier is not required to develop the volume of re-fresh items that it proposed in its tender response.
7. The Supplier is to provide Ofqual with at least 2 years' prior written notice of its intention not to accept an offer to extend the Agreement for the 2 year period 2020-2022.
|