 |
Open procedure |
 |
Restricted procedure |
b) The products involved are manufactured purely for the purpose of research, experiment, study or
development under the conditions stated in the Directive (for supplies only).
c) The works/goods/services can be provided only by a particular tenderer for reasons that are:
 |
Technical |
 |
Artistic |
 |
Connected with the protection of exclusive rights |
d) Extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority and in
accordance with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
e) Additional works/deliveries/services are ordered under the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
f) New works/services, constituting a repetition of existing works/services and ordered in accordance
with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
g)Service contract awarded to the successful candidate or one of them after a design contest.
h) For supplies quoted and purchased on a commodity market.
i) For the purchase of supplies on particularly advantageous terms:
 |
from a supplier which is definitely winding up its business activities |
 |
from the receivers or liquidators of a bankruptcy, an arrangement with creditors or a similar procedure. |
j) All tenders submitted in reply to an open procedure, a restricted procedure or competitive dialogue were irregular or
unacceptable. Only those tenderers were included in the negotiations which have satisfied the qualitative selection criteria.
Other justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a
contract notice in the OJEU:
k) The contract has as its object services listed in Annex B of Directive 2004/18/EC or in Annex XVII B of Directive 2004/17/EC
l) The contract falls outside the scope of application of the relevant directive.
In addition to the box(es) ticked above please explain in a clear and
comprehensive manner why the award of the contract without prior publication of
a contract notice in the OJEU is lawful, stating in any case the relevant facts,
and, as appropriate, the conclusions of law in accordance with the articles in
the relevant Directive (500 words maximum):
The Francis Crick Institute intends to procure a mass cytometer from Fluidigm, as we are unaware of any other supplier who would be able to provide this technology.
The instrument would be installed to customised requirements within the Flow Cytometry facility at the Crick. The key requirements of the system are:
— Analysis of individual cells labelled with stable metal isotopes using state of the art inductively coupled plasma time of flight (TOF) technology;
— 135 detection channels allowing simultaneous resolution of multiple elemental probes at high acquisition rates allowing detection of over 100 analytes;
— High sensitivity for low level expression of targets with a detection limit of fewer than 350 antibodies/cell;
— Peak throughput 2000 events/sec;
— Dynamic range 4.5 orders of magnitude;
— Addition of an imaging module allowing laser ablation of micron sized pieces of tissue and introduction of these to a mass cytometer;
— Automated calibration and quality control;
— Pneumatic sample introduction.
|