II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
45214400
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UKM77
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
The Campus Central project comprises circa 2 285m2 of refurbishment works to the existing Atrium area in the Andrew Miller Building, and a 3 storey linked extension of circa 3 215m2
The project will be delivered through a two-stage Design & Build procurement route with the design team key disciplines being novated to the Principal Contractor at the end of the second stage procurement. The University requires a Principal Contractor with the expertise and a proven track record in the refurbishment and the development of outstanding facilities to advise and assist with the delivery of the optimum redevelopment solution from the technical design stage through to a successful project completion and facility use.
The project may be delivered in a phased manner allowing for safe access to, and use of, the existing library, shops, catering and faith facilities, Student Union and Macrobert Art Centre, all with the absolute minimum disturbance. The works must be fully coordinated and programmed to maintain the provision of services while minimising disruption to all campus users. The Principal Contractor must work collaboratively with other partner projects who may be working at the same time on the University campus, and must be able to demonstrate a robust understanding and experience of working within and adjacent occupied buildings on a live operational campus with least interference to the University’s operations.
The team for the project will include:
PM and Principal Designer — Gleeds,
Architect – Page / Park,
M&E Engineer – Harley Haddow,
Cost Consultant - Brownriggs,
Fire Engineer – Buro Happold,
Structural Engineer – Woolgar Hunter,
Landscape Architect – Ian White Associates.
II.2.5) Award criteria
Quality criterion: Service delivery
/ Weighting: 3
Quality criterion: Managing supply chain
/ Weighting: 3
Quality criterion: Work package
/ Weighting: 3
Quality criterion: Planning and coordination
/ Weighting: 2.25
Quality criterion: Mobilisation period
/ Weighting: 2.25
Quality criterion: Reducing impact on key events
/ Weighting: 3
Quality criterion: Construction programming
/ Weighting: 4.5
Quality criterion: University business activities
/ Weighting: 4.5
Quality criterion: Commissioning, handover and defects
/ Weighting: 2.25
Quality criterion: Demonstrations and familiarisation
/ Weighting: 2.25
Price
/ Weighting:
70
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
No