Other: Voluntary, government owners require compliance to OJEU process
II.1.1) Title
Background and Integrity Checks Panel
II.1.2) Main CPV code
73210000
II.1.3) Type of contract
Services
II.1.4) Short description
PIDG Ltd is seeking proposals on behalf of the PIDG Companies in respect of the appointment of a panel of companies to provide background and integrity reports. PIDG Companies commission two types of background and integrity reports:
(i) as part of its recruitment process, PIDG Companies undertake pre-employment screening on their senior hires; and
(ii) as part of the customer due diligence process on project.
PIDG is looking to appoint a panel of companies for each area (see below) to provide background and integrity reports for a period of 12 months with an option to renew the agreement for 3 extensions for a further 12-month period.
II.1.6) Information about lots
This contract is divided into lots:
Yes
II.1.7) Total value of the procurement
Lowest offer:
1.00
EUR/ Highest offer:
1.00
EUR
Lot No: 1
II.2.1) Title
Pre-employment Screening Panel
II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
73210000
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UK
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
Content of reports
These will primarily be a desktop review with limited in-country source inquiries, save as required to provide the information required pursuant to the scope of work.
— professional and personal background inquiries,
— verification of qualifications (where possible) and experience,
— political exposure,
— regulatory and compliance checks against international sanctions watchlists,
— general reputational issues which would impact the decision to appoint the candidate,
— details of any anti-bribery/corruption or ethical issues (past or present) with which the candidate has/may have been involved,
— details of any legal proceedings (past or present) relating to the candidate including civil, felony, misdemeanour and multi-jurisdictional criminal record checks,
— details of other directorships of the candidate,
— searches of the candidate against public registers,
— a report as to the suitability of the candidate to be appointed,
— would there be a reputational risk for in appointing the candidate?, and
— is there any other reason why the candidate should not be appointed?
There may be additional specific questions for some reports.
Countries
Across the PIDG, personnel are currently based in the following countries (note that candidates may be based in other jurisdictions and PIDG may open new offices):
— UK,
— Kenya,
— Singapore,
— Senegal.
Timing
Please note that we typically require a report 2 weeks from appointment for review and comment by the relevant PIDG Company, before the report is finalised shortly thereafter.
II.2.5) Award criteria
Quality criterion: Previous relevant experience
/ Weighting: 25
Quality criterion: Quality control procedures
/ Weighting: 10
Quality criterion: Example report
/ Weighting: 25
Cost criterion: Cost of reports
/ Weighting: 25
Cost criterion: Pricing senario
/ Weighting: 15
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
Yes
Lot No: 2
II.2.1) Title
Pre-employment Screening Panel
II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
73210000
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UK
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
Content of reports
These will primarily be a desktop review with limited in-country source inquiries, save as required to provide the information required pursuant to the scope of work.
— professional and personal background inquiries,
— verification of qualifications (where possible) and experience,
— political exposure,
— regulatory and compliance checks against international sanctions watchlists,
— general reputational issues which would impact the decision to appoint the candidate,
— details of any anti-bribery/corruption or ethical issues (past or present) with which the candidate has/may have been involved,
— details of any legal proceedings (past or present) relating to the candidate including civil, felony, misdemeanour and multi-jurisdictional criminal record checks,
— details of other directorships of the candidate,
— searches of the candidate against public registers,
— a report as to the suitability of the candidate to be appointed,
— would there be a reputational risk for in appointing the candidate?, and
— is there any other reason why the candidate should not be appointed?
There may be additional specific questions for some reports.
Countries
Across the PIDG, personnel are currently based in the following countries (note that candidates may be based in other jurisdictions and PIDG may open new offices):
— UK,
— Kenya,
— Singapore,
— Senegal.
Timing
Please note that we typically require a report 2 weeks from appointment for review and comment by the relevant PIDG Company, before the report is finalised shortly thereafter.
II.2.5) Award criteria
Quality criterion: Previous relevant experience
/ Weighting: 25
Quality criterion: Quality control procedures
/ Weighting: 10
Quality criterion: Example report
/ Weighting: 25
Cost criterion: Cost of reports
/ Weighting: 25
Cost criterion: Pricing senario
/ Weighting: 15
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
Yes
Lot No: 3
II.2.1) Title
Pre-employment Screening Panel
II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
73210000
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UK
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
Content of reports
These will primarily be a desktop review with limited in-country source inquiries, save as required to provide the information required pursuant to the scope of work.
— professional and personal background inquiries,
— verification of qualifications (where possible) and experience,
— political exposure,
— regulatory and compliance checks against international sanctions watchlists,
— general reputational issues which would impact the decision to appoint the candidate,
— details of any anti-bribery/corruption or ethical issues (past or present) with which the candidate has/may have been involved,
— details of any legal proceedings (past or present) relating to the candidate including civil, felony, misdemeanour and multi-jurisdictional criminal record checks,
— details of other directorships of the candidate,
— searches of the candidate against public registers,
— a report as to the suitability of the candidate to be appointed,
— would there be a reputational risk for in appointing the candidate?, and
— is there any other reason why the candidate should not be appointed?
There may be additional specific questions for some reports.
Countries
Across the PIDG, personnel are currently based in the following countries (note that candidates may be based in other jurisdictions and PIDG may open new offices):
— UK,
— Kenya,
— Singapore,
— Senegal.
Timing
Please note that we typically require a report 2 weeks from appointment for review and comment by the relevant PIDG Company, before the report is finalised shortly thereafter.
II.2.5) Award criteria
Quality criterion: Previous relevant experience
/ Weighting: 25
Quality criterion: Quality control procedures
/ Weighting: 10
Quality criterion: Example report
/ Weighting: 25
Cost criterion: Cost of reports
/ Weighting: 25
Cost criterion: Pricing senario
/ Weighting: 15
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
Yes
The contract has been awarded to a group of economic operators:
No
The contract has been awarded to a group of economic operators:
No
The contract has been awarded to a group of economic operators:
No