VOLUNTARY EX ANTE TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
|
|
Section I: Contracting Authority/Entity
|
I.1)
|
Name, Address and Contact Point(s)
|
|
The Crown Prosecution Service |
Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge |
London |
SE1 9HS |
UK |
Crown Prosecution Service
Jackie Palmer |
+44 2033570000 |
jackie.palmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk |
|
http://cps.gov.uk/
|
|
I.2)
|
Type of contracting Authority and Main Activity or Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
Section II: Object of the Contract
|
II.1)
|
Description
|
II.1.1)
|
Title attributed to the contract by the contracting authority
Managed Telephony Agreement: Contract Number PR/34/2006.
|
II.1.2(a))
|
Type of works contract
|
II.1.2(b))
|
Type of supplies contract
|
II.1.2(c))
|
Type of service contract5 |
II.1.2)
|
Main site or location of works, place of delivery or performance
UK.
|
II.1.3)
|
This notice involves a framework agreementNo |
II.1.4)
|
Short description of the contract or purchase(s)
The subject matter of this voluntary ex ante transparency notice is the amendment to a managed telephony agreement awarded by the authority on 25.1.2006 (the “Agreement”). The Contracting Authority advertised its requirements for telephony services in a notice sent to the official journal of the European Union on 26.1.2005. The Agreement was awarded following the completion of a negotiated procurement procedure carried out pursuant to the requirements of the Public Services Contracts Regulations 1993 (No. 3228) (implementing Directive 92/50/EEC). The amendment provides that the Agreement:
a) is extended so as to expire on 30.11.2015 with an option in favour of the Contracting Authority to extend the Agreement by notice beyond 30.11.2015 by monthly extension periods up to the 31.3.2016 (a total maximum extension beyond its current term of 12 months);
b) is amended to remove as from 31.3.2015, certain benchmarking provisions and technology refresh obligations which the parties to the Agreement believe are no longer appropriate during the extension period; and
c) is amended to include an obligation on the Contracting Authority to meet certain limited costs which may arise as a result of this amendment.
(the “Amendment”)
The Amendment has been agreed in order to enable the Contracting Authority's completion of a new procurement exercise to replace the services under the Agreement.
|
II.1.5)
|
Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)
|
|
|
|
64200000 |
|
|
|
|
|
II.1.6)
|
Contract covered by the government procurement agreement (GPA) Yes |
II.2)
|
Total final value of the contract(s)
|
II.2.1)
|
Total final value of the contract(s)
|
Section IV: Procedure
|
IV.1)
|
Type of procedure
|
IV.1.1)
|
Type of procedure |
IV.2)
|
Award criteria
|
IV.2.1)
|
Award criteria
|
IV.2.2)
|
An electronic auction has been used No |
IV.3)
|
Administrative information
|
IV.3.1)
|
File reference number attributed by the contracting authority
CCN15
|
IV.3.2)
|
Previous publication(s) concerning the same contract 2005/S 20-019819 28-01-2005
Other previous publications
|
Section V: Award of contract
|
|
|
V.1)
|
Date of contract award decision: |
V.2)
|
Numbers of offers received: |
V.3)
|
Name and address of economic operator to whom the contract has been awarded
Level 3 Communications UK Limited (formerly Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Limited) |
7th Floor 10 Fleet Place |
London |
EC4M 7RB |
UK |
|
|
|
|
|
V.4)
|
Information on value of contract |
V.5)
|
The contract is likely to be subcontracted No
|
|
Short description of the value/proportion of the contract to be subcontracted
|
Section VI: Complementary Information
|
VI.1)
|
Contract related to a project and/or programme financed by community funds? No
|
VI.2)
|
Additional Information
|
VI.3)
|
Procedures for appeal
|
VI.3.1)
|
Body responsible for appeal procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Body responsible for mediation procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI.3.2)
|
Lodging of appeals
|
VI.3.3)
|
Service from which information about the lodging of appeals may be obtained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI.4)
|
Dispatch date of this Notice 23-07-2014 |
Annex D1 – General procurement
Justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU)
Directive 2004/18/EC
|
|
|
Open procedure |
|
Restricted procedure |
b) The products involved are manufactured purely for the purpose of research, experiment, study or
development under the conditions stated in the Directive (for supplies only).
c) The works/goods/services can be provided only by a particular tenderer for reasons that are:
|
Technical |
|
Artistic |
|
Connected with the protection of exclusive rights |
d) Extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority and in
accordance with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
e) Additional works/deliveries/services are ordered under the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
f) New works/services, constituting a repetition of existing works/services and ordered in accordance
with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
g)Service contract awarded to the successful candidate or one of them after a design contest.
h) For supplies quoted and purchased on a commodity market.
i) For the purchase of supplies on particularly advantageous terms:
|
from a supplier which is definitely winding up its business activities |
|
from the receivers or liquidators of a bankruptcy, an arrangement with creditors or a similar procedure. |
j) All tenders submitted in reply to an open procedure, a restricted procedure or competitive dialogue were irregular or
unacceptable. Only those tenderers were included in the negotiations which have satisfied the qualitative selection criteria.
Other justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a
contract notice in the OJEU:
k) The contract has as its object services listed in Annex B of Directive 2004/18/EC or in Annex XVII B of Directive 2004/17/EC
l) The contract falls outside the scope of application of the relevant directive.
In addition to the box(es) ticked above please explain in a clear and
comprehensive manner why the award of the contract without prior publication of
a contract notice in the OJEU is lawful, stating in any case the relevant facts,
and, as appropriate, the conclusions of law in accordance with the articles in
the relevant Directive (500 words maximum):
The Contracting Authority considers that the nature of the Amendment as more particularly described in paragraph II.1.4) does not represent a material amendment so as to amount to the award of a new agreement. The Contracting Authority has come to this conclusion based upon its consideration of certain jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union in particular the decision of the Court in the case of Pressetext v Republik Österreich (Bund) and others [2008] EUECJ C-454/06. As noted the Amendment includes an increase in the term of the Agreement by the inclusion of a further extension period of 8 months up to a maximum of a 12 months, certain minor changes to the obligations of the parties and the inclusion of an obligation to meet certain costs which might arise as a result of the Amendment. The Contracting Authority has considered the nature and scope of the initial procurement exercise and the Agreement and has concluded that the changes envisaged by the Amendment are not material. Accordingly, the agreement of the Amendment does not represent the award of a public services contract under Directive 2004/18/EC.
|