Contract award notice
Results of the procurement procedure
Section I: Contracting
entity
I.1) Name and addresses
HUMBER TEACHING NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
RV9
Trust HQ, Willerby Hill, Beverley Road, Willerby
Hull
HU106ED
UK
Contact person: Charlene Reeson
Telephone: +44 7825090915
E-mail: c.reeson@nhs.net
NUTS: UKE12
Internet address(es)
Main address: https://www.humber.nhs.uk/
I.4) Type of the contracting authority
Body governed by public law
I.5) Main activity
Health
Section II: Object
II.1) Scope of the procurement
II.1.1) Title
Physiotherapy Services
II.1.2) Main CPV code
85142100
II.1.3) Type of contract
Services
II.1.4) Short description
Physiotherapy services
II.1.6) Information about lots
This contract is divided into lots:
No
II.1.7) Total value of the procurement
Value excluding VAT:
20 000.00
GBP
II.2) Description
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UKE
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
Physiotherapy Services.
We are intending to award a contract to an existing provider following direct award process C.
Approximate lifetime value of the contract is £20,000.00 pa
Delivered between 01/06/2025-31/05/2028
II.2.5) Award criteria
Cost criterion: the existing provider is satisfying the original contract and will likely satisfy the proposed contract to a sufficient standard
/ Weighting: 100
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
No
Section IV: Procedure
IV.1) Description
IV.1.1) Type of procedure
Award of a contract without prior publication of a call for competition
Justification for selected award procedure:
The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the Directive
Explanation
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to the relevant authority by 22/05/2025. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR'.
IV.1.8) Information about Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)
The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement:
No
Section V: Award of contract
A contract/lot is awarded:
Yes
V.2 Award of contract
V.2.1) Date of conclusion of the contract
09/05/2025
V.2.2) Information about tenders
Number of tenders received: 1
The contract has been awarded to a group of economic operators:
No
V.2.3) Name and address of the contractor
Physio Med
02853100
Leeds
UK
NUTS: UKE
The contractor is an SME:
Yes
V.2.4) Information on value of the contract/lot (excluding VAT)
Initial estimated total value of the contract/lot:
Total value of the contract/lot:
: 20 000.00
GBP
V.2.5) Information about subcontracting
Section VI: Complementary information
VI.3) Additional information
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 22/05/2025. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR.'
Written representations should be sent to Phillip.Simmons@nhs.net
Details of the award decision-makers are Sonia Wadley and Karen Phillips.
The relative importance of the key criteria that the relevant authority used to make a decision, the rationale for the relative importance of the key criteria, and the rationale for choosing the provider with reference to the key criteria are listed below:
The incumbent provider was assessed against the key and basic criteria and scored by pass/fail. Each criteria was assigned an equal weighting, none more so than the other. It was felt all the criteria was classified as a critical success factor to the Trust, which led to the decision of equal weightings.
VI.4) Procedures for review
VI.4.1) Review body
Independent patient choice and procurement panel
London
UK
VI.5) Date of dispatch of this notice
12/05/2025