VOLUNTARY EX ANTE TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
|
|
Section I: Contracting Authority/Entity
|
I.1)
|
Name, Address and Contact Point(s)
|
|
Health and Safety ExecutiveUK |
Redgrave Court Merton Road Bootle Merseyside |
Bootle |
L20 7HS |
UK |
Tommy Johnson |
+44 2030283015 |
tenders@hse.gov.uk |
|
www.hse.gov.uk
|
|
I.2)
|
Type of contracting Authority and Main Activity or Activities
|
|
No |
Section II: Object of the Contract
|
II.1)
|
Description
|
II.1.1)
|
Title attributed to the contract by the contracting authority
Independent and Expert Technical Advice — Graphite
|
II.1.2(a))
|
Type of works contract
|
II.1.2(b))
|
Type of supplies contract
|
II.1.2(c))
|
Type of service contract27 |
II.1.2)
|
Main site or location of works, place of delivery or performance
North West, England. UKD33 |
II.1.3)
|
This notice involves a framework agreementNo |
II.1.4)
|
Short description of the contract or purchase(s)
To secure access to independent (from licensees) technical advice relating to the ageing and behavior of nuclear graphite cores; assessment of validity of safety cases and academic research into various aspects of ageing phenomena in graphite.
|
II.1.5)
|
Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)
|
|
|
|
73000000 |
|
|
|
|
|
II.1.6)
|
Contract covered by the government procurement agreement (GPA) No |
II.2)
|
Total final value of the contract(s)
|
II.2.1)
|
Total final value of the contract(s)
922 372,00
GBP
|
Section IV: Procedure
|
IV.1)
|
Type of procedure
|
IV.1.1)
|
Type of procedure |
IV.2)
|
Award criteria
|
IV.2.1)
|
Award criteria
|
|
|
|
Ability to deliver the required services |
99 |
|
Affordability |
1 |
|
IV.2.2)
|
An electronic auction has been used Yes |
IV.3)
|
Administrative information
|
IV.3.1)
|
File reference number attributed by the contracting authority
1.11.4.3330.
|
IV.3.2)
|
Previous publication(s) concerning the same contract
Other previous publications
|
Section V: Award of contract
|
|
|
|
V.1)
|
Date of contract award decision: |
V.2)
|
Numbers of offers received: |
V.3)
|
Name and address of economic operator to whom the contract has been awarded
University of Manchester |
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Pariser Building |
Manchester |
M13 9PL |
UK |
|
|
|
|
|
V.4)
|
Information on value of contract
922 372,00 GBP
922 372,00 GBP
4 |
V.5)
|
The contract is likely to be subcontracted No
|
|
|
Short description of the value/proportion of the contract to be subcontracted
|
Section VI: Complementary Information
|
VI.1)
|
Contract related to a project and/or programme financed by community funds? No
|
VI.2)
|
Additional Information
None
|
VI.3)
|
Procedures for appeal
|
VI.3.1)
|
Body responsible for appeal procedures
Tommy Johnson — Health and Safety Executive |
Redgrave Court, Merton Road Bootle, Merseyside |
Bootle |
L20 7HS |
UK |
tommy.johnson@hse.gov.uk |
+44 1519513078 |
www.hse.gov.uk |
|
|
|
|
Body responsible for mediation procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI.3.2)
|
Lodging of appeals
|
VI.3.3)
|
Service from which information about the lodging of appeals may be obtained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI.4)
|
Dispatch date of this Notice 10-10-2018 |
Annex D1 – General procurement
Justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU)
Directive 2004/18/EC
|
|
 |
Open procedure |
 |
Restricted procedure |
b) The products involved are manufactured purely for the purpose of research, experiment, study or
development under the conditions stated in the Directive (for supplies only).
c) The works/goods/services can be provided only by a particular tenderer for reasons that are:
 |
Technical |
 |
Artistic |
 |
Connected with the protection of exclusive rights |
d) Extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority and in
accordance with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
e) Additional works/deliveries/services are ordered under the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
f) New works/services, constituting a repetition of existing works/services and ordered in accordance
with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
g)Service contract awarded to the successful candidate or one of them after a design contest.
h) For supplies quoted and purchased on a commodity market.
i) For the purchase of supplies on particularly advantageous terms:
 |
from a supplier which is definitely winding up its business activities |
 |
from the receivers or liquidators of a bankruptcy, an arrangement with creditors or a similar procedure. |
j) All tenders submitted in reply to an open procedure, a restricted procedure or competitive dialogue were irregular or
unacceptable. Only those tenderers were included in the negotiations which have satisfied the qualitative selection criteria.
Other justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a
contract notice in the OJEU:
k) The contract has as its object services listed in Annex B of Directive 2004/18/EC or in Annex XVII B of Directive 2004/17/EC
l) The contract falls outside the scope of application of the relevant directive.
In addition to the box(es) ticked above please explain in a clear and
comprehensive manner why the award of the contract without prior publication of
a contract notice in the OJEU is lawful, stating in any case the relevant facts,
and, as appropriate, the conclusions of law in accordance with the articles in
the relevant Directive (500 words maximum):
Award of a contract without prior publication of a call for competition in OJEU in the case listed below. Regulation 32(2)(b)(ii) whereby "competition is absent for technical reasons". ONR asserts its belief that the University of Manchester are the only economic operator in the EU that are capable to support ONR with the independent, expert advice to mount an authoritative, but constructive challenge to the Licensee's arguments / submissions and to ensure that judgements made are consistent with a broadly based authoritative scientific consensus. Containing experts, leading academic authority and industry professionals. ONR has no knowledge of any other fully independent operator who holds the ability to satisfy its requirement at present and consequently asserts general grounds are satisfied.
|