II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
85000000
85121280
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UKD
UK
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
This procurement is for a new tier 2 community dermatology service in Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre. The main outcomes of the service will be:
— equitable access and treatment of dermatology patients presenting with dermatological problems within different levels of deprivation,
— increased overall patient’s satisfaction with dermatology services,
— provider services closer to patients’ home,
— improved communication between community, secondary and primary care services provider, specialist clinicians and primary care,
— improved quality of care within primary and community settings regardless of provider,
— increased patient choice,
— improved access to advice and information, increased knowledge and awareness of the management of dermatology for patients,
— reduced waiting time for patient’s access to specialist care in the community,
— improve access to advice and information with increased knowledge and awareness of the self-management of their condition.
The contract duration will be for 3 years, which is intended to run from 1.11.2018 until 31.10.2021 with the possibility of one extension of up to 2 years (31.10.2023). The anticipated, maximum total contract value (including any potential extensions) is 3 605 441 GBP with an annual value estimated at 721 088 GBP.
The Services to which this procurement relates fall within schedule 3 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (the ‘Regulations’). As such, the procurement of the service is being run as a single-stage application process applying the open procedure.
II.2.5) Award criteria
Quality criterion: Service delivery model
/ Weighting: 36
Quality criterion: Patient needs, engagement, continuous/self-care, safety and experience
/ Weighting: 11
Quality criterion: Resource, retention and recruitment
/ Weighting: 15.5
Quality criterion: Service mobilisation
/ Weighting: 14.5
Quality criterion: IT
/ Weighting: 4
Quality criterion: Reporting
/ Weighting: 9
Quality criterion: Bidder interview/presentations
/ Weighting: 10
Cost criterion: The recommended bidder must achieve the highest quality per 100 000 GBP expenditure score
/ Weighting: Highest score
Cost criterion: Where a bid price exceeds the maximum annual affordability threshold published by the contracting authority, the Bid will be rejected and further evaluation of the Bid will not take place
/ Weighting: Pass/Fail
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
No