VOLUNTARY EX ANTE TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
|
|
Section I: Contracting Authority/Entity
|
I.1)
|
Name, Address and Contact Point(s)
|
|
The Council of the Borough of North Tyneside |
Quadrant, The Silverlink North, Cobalt Business Park |
North Tyneside |
NE27 0BY |
UK |
Quadrant, The Silverlink North, Cobalt Business Park, North Tyneside, NE27 0BY
Julie Gullon |
+44 1916435653 |
julie.gullon@northtyneside.gov.uk |
|
http://my.northtyneside.gov.uk/
https://procontract.due-north.com/Login
https://procontract.due-north.com/Login
https://procontract.due-north.com/Login
|
|
I.2)
|
Type of contracting Authority and Main Activity or Activities
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
No |
Section II: Object of the Contract
|
II.1)
|
Description
|
II.1.1)
|
Title attributed to the contract by the contracting authority
Agreement relating to the development of land at Backworth Primary School, Title Number TT338161 — Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
|
II.1.2(a))
|
Type of works contract
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
II.1.2(b))
|
Type of supplies contract
|
II.1.2(c))
|
Type of service contract
|
II.1.2)
|
Main site or location of works, place of delivery or performance
North Tyneside, Backworth Primary School. UKC22 |
II.1.3)
|
This notice involves a framework agreementNo |
II.1.4)
|
Short description of the contract or purchase(s)
The proposed contract will be a planning obligation pursuant to Section 106 of the Town and country Planning Act 1990 relating to the proposed development at Backworth Primary School, Title Number TT338161 (‘the Development’). it will contain a series of commitments by the Developer, conditional on implementation of the Development (entirely at the discretion of the Developer) and progress of the Development for delivery of mitigating measures including the design and construction of a primary school. The Developer also has the choice of providing land to North Tyneside Council (‘Contracting Authority’) plus funding so that the Contracting Authority may design and construct the primary school instead.
|
II.1.5)
|
Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV)
|
|
|
|
45210000 |
|
|
|
|
|
II.1.6)
|
Contract covered by the government procurement agreement (GPA) Yes |
II.2)
|
Total final value of the contract(s)
|
II.2.1)
|
Total final value of the contract(s)
4 912 729
GBP
|
Section IV: Procedure
|
IV.1)
|
Type of procedure
|
IV.1.1)
|
Type of procedure |
IV.2)
|
Award criteria
|
IV.2.1)
|
Award criteria |
IV.2.2)
|
An electronic auction has been used Yes |
IV.3)
|
Administrative information
|
IV.3.1)
|
File reference number attributed by the contracting authority
SP000958
|
IV.3.2)
|
Previous publication(s) concerning the same contract
Other previous publications
|
Section V: Award of contract
|
|
|
|
V.1)
|
Date of contract award decision: |
V.2)
|
Numbers of offers received: |
V.3)
|
Name and address of economic operator to whom the contract has been awarded
Northumberland Estates |
Estate Office, Alnwick Castle |
Alnwick |
NE66 1NQ |
UK |
info@northumberlandestates.co.uk |
+44 1665510777 |
www.northumberlandestates.co.uk |
|
|
V.4)
|
Information on value of contract
4 912 729 GBP
4 912 729 GBP
|
V.5)
|
The contract is likely to be subcontracted No
|
|
|
Short description of the value/proportion of the contract to be subcontracted
|
Section VI: Complementary Information
|
VI.1)
|
Contract related to a project and/or programme financed by community funds? No
|
VI.2)
|
Additional Information
|
VI.3)
|
Procedures for appeal
|
VI.3.1)
|
Body responsible for appeal procedures
North Tyneside Council |
Quadrant, The Silverlink North, Cobalt Business Park, North Tyneside |
Newcastle upon Tyne |
NE27 0BY |
UK |
|
|
http://my.northtyneside.gov.uk/ |
|
|
|
|
Body responsible for mediation procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI.3.2)
|
Lodging of appeals
|
VI.3.3)
|
Service from which information about the lodging of appeals may be obtained
North Tyneside Council |
Quadrant, The Silverlink North, Cobalt Business Park, North Tyneside |
Newcastle upon Tyne |
NE27 0BY |
UK |
|
|
http://my.northtyneside.gov.uk/ |
|
|
VI.4)
|
Dispatch date of this Notice 19-09-2016 |
Annex D1 – General procurement
Justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU)
Directive 2004/18/EC
|
|
 |
Open procedure |
 |
Restricted procedure |
b) The products involved are manufactured purely for the purpose of research, experiment, study or
development under the conditions stated in the Directive (for supplies only).
c) The works/goods/services can be provided only by a particular tenderer for reasons that are:
 |
Technical |
 |
Artistic |
 |
Connected with the protection of exclusive rights |
d) Extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority and in
accordance with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
e) Additional works/deliveries/services are ordered under the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
f) New works/services, constituting a repetition of existing works/services and ordered in accordance
with the strict conditions stated in the Directive.
g)Service contract awarded to the successful candidate or one of them after a design contest.
h) For supplies quoted and purchased on a commodity market.
i) For the purchase of supplies on particularly advantageous terms:
 |
from a supplier which is definitely winding up its business activities |
 |
from the receivers or liquidators of a bankruptcy, an arrangement with creditors or a similar procedure. |
j) All tenders submitted in reply to an open procedure, a restricted procedure or competitive dialogue were irregular or
unacceptable. Only those tenderers were included in the negotiations which have satisfied the qualitative selection criteria.
Other justification for the award of the contract without prior publication of a
contract notice in the OJEU:
k) The contract has as its object services listed in Annex B of Directive 2004/18/EC or in Annex XVII B of Directive 2004/17/EC
l) The contract falls outside the scope of application of the relevant directive.
In addition to the box(es) ticked above please explain in a clear and
comprehensive manner why the award of the contract without prior publication of
a contract notice in the OJEU is lawful, stating in any case the relevant facts,
and, as appropriate, the conclusions of law in accordance with the articles in
the relevant Directive (500 words maximum):
In the proposed agreement (‘the Section 106 Agreement’) the Developer is afforded the choice of providing: a. Land for a primary school and funding for the construction which does not amount to a public works contract because there is no contract with the Developer for works to be undertaken b. The Developer undertaking the construction of the new primary school and then the Authority will take a 125 year lease of the premises. The agreement where option b is adopted for the new primary school to be built by the Developer does not constitute a public works contract on 2 grounds. 1. The essential ingredient of a public works contract is that it is for pecuniary interest — see Regulation 2 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (‘the Regulations’). The Advocate General's opinion on European Commissionaire (Kingdom of Spain) (2011) CR GO attempts to provide a definitive statement of the meaning of ‘pecuniary interest’ concluding that it implies that the Contracting Authority needs to use its own funds either directly or indirectly. Direct financing will occur when the Contracting Authority uses public funds to pay for the works or services in question. Indirect financing will occur when the Contracting Authority suffers economic detriment as a result of the method of financing the works or services. In this case there is no direct financing and as the grant of planning permission does not amount to pecuniary interest (see Hulmut Muller GMbHv Bundesanstalt Fur Immobilienaufgaben), there is no consideration given in return for the requirement to construct a school. 2. It is also a requirement of a public works contract that there must be a legally enforceable obligation to carry out works or work. The High Court determined in R (Midlands Co-operative Society Limited) v Birmingham CityCouncil (1) Tesco Stores Limited (2) that where the building obligations in an agreement pursuant to Section 106 Town and Country Planning Act 1980 (‘S106 Agreement’) were conditional upon the developer commencing the development which he was not legally obliged to do, there was no public works contract. The Section 106 agreement in this case is a S106 Agreement and the building obligations will indeed be conditional upon the Developer commencing and then progressing the development which it will not be legally obliged to do. Notes: 1. The estimated value of the school works is 4 912 729 GBP; 2. In the S106 Agreement, the Developer will agree to undertake a transparent and impartial procurement process for the school works.
|