II.2.2) Additional CPV code(s)
90919200
II.2.3) Place of performance
NUTS code:
UKM50
II.2.4) Description of the procurement
Food Standards Scotland is based in Aberdeen and seeks an office cleaning service. It seeks to appoint a single Contractor to provide and manage cleaning services within the FSS office location in Pilgrim House, Old Ford Rd, Aberdeen. FSS seeks an innovative supplier with strong customer focus with the ability to deliver cleaning and minor repair services to FSS. FSS seeks to work collaboratively with the supplier to encourage innovative service solutions while embracing and delivering continuous improvement.
The principal objectives of the contract for the services will be to deliver:
— good quality office cleaning,
— value for money.
The range of services required include:
— routine cleaning,
— reactive cleaning,
— deep cleaning,
— window cleaning (internal side of building windows) and internal glass partitions,
— document shredding,
— ad hoc reactive maintenance and repair work,
— testing of potable water sources,
— testing and maintenance of fire detection systems and emergency lighting,
— certification of fire extinguishers,
— general lighting maintenance.
II.2.5) Award criteria
Criteria below:
Quality criterion: Quality
/ Weighting: 60
Price
/ Weighting:
40
II.2.6) Estimated value
Value excluding VAT:
110 000.00
GBP
II.2.7) Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
Duration in months: 36
This contract is subject to renewal: Yes
Description of renewals:
The initial contract will have a 3-year duration. FSS will reserve the right to extend for a period of a further 12-month period.
II.2.9) Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
Envisaged minimum number: 5
Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
ESPD Q4C1.2
Example 1 will be weighted at 50 %
Sub weightings as follows:
— Annual contract value (nil sub weighting),
— The nature of the state covered by the contract including number of buildings, age of buildings, size of buildings, operational hours of estate (nil sub weighting),
— Range of services covered in the contract(nil sub weighting),
— How you implemented and delivered continuous improvement and innovation for the example contract (50 % sub weighting),
— Details of how you delivered financial savings in the example contract while continuing to meet required quality standards (50 % sub weighting).
Example 2 is weighted as 50 %;
Sub weightings as follows:
— Annual contract value (nil sub weighting),
— The nature of the state covered by the contract including number of buildings, age of buildings, size of buildings, operational hours of estate (nil sub weighting),
— Range of services covered in the contract (nil sub weighting),
— Approach to contract management including a evidence of integrating services to achieve an integrated and consistent approach to the contract (30 % sub weighting),
— How you worked collaboratively and in partnership with the client (35 % sub weighting),
— How you demonstrated a strong customer focus (35%sub weighting).
Each example has a weighting of 50 % and each will be scored using the following matrix:
Description Mark
4 — Excellent — Response is completely relevant and excellent overall. The response is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirement and provides details of how the requirement will be met in full.
3 — Good — Response is relevant and good. The response is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding and provides details on how the requirements will be fulfilled.
2 — Acceptable — Response is relevant and acceptable. The response addresses a broad understanding of the requirement but may lack details on how the requirement will be fulfilled in certain areas.
1 — Poor — Response is partially relevant and poor. The response addresses some elements of the requirement but contains insufficient/limited detail or explanation to demonstrate how the requirement will be fulfilled.
0 — Unacceptable — Nil or inadequate response. Fails to demonstrate an ability to meet the requirement.
FSS intends to take a maximum of 6 bidders through to award stage. However, where a tie for 6th place occurs, all bidders tied for 6th place will be taken through to the award stage.
II.2.10) Information about variants
Variants will be accepted:
No
II.2.11) Information about options
Options:
No
II.2.13) Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
No
II.2.14) Additional information
ESPD Part III — Exclusion Grounds — Economic operators may be excluded from this competition if they are in any of the situations referred to in regulation 58 of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015.