Minimum standards and qualification required
Tender Process
The appointment process will be conducted through a written tender evaluation and, a clarification interview or presentation. The top three scoring bids will go forward into the stage 2 presentation. Questions will be issued to the three suppliers prior to the presentation, 50% of the marks achieved in the quality section at stage one will be carried forward to the final score. The presentation will be awarded 50% of the total quality score. The award score will comprise of 30% for the initial price, 50% of stage 1 quality score and 50% of stage two quality score.
The tenderers must submit responses to the following questions:
Section 1: Pricing and Commercial Proposal 30%
Question 1 25%
Please provide a clear fixed-price proposal for the first year of the audit based on 35 audit days in your pricing include daily rates by grade, assumptions, any optional extension pricing. The commercial proposal must be fully inclusive of all expenses and disbursements.
• Standard day is 7.5 working hours.
• Daily rate must be fully inclusive and include all expenses such as travelling, parking, lunch, equipment, materials and disbursements etc but exclusive of VAT.
• Daily rate must incorporate costs for management/partner time for attending monthly and quarterly meetings and attending the Governance and Audit Committee if required.
The price score will be awarded based on the total cost of the first year 35 days audit , the hourly rates for staff types in the contract will be fixed to the rates detailed in the first year costs and increased by the agreed annual percentage increase
Question 2 – Annual Percentage Increase for Contract Years 2, 3, 4 and 5 – 5%
Please state the maximum percentage increase that will be applied to the fixed daily rates and annual contract price for each subsequent contract year after Year 1.
Tenderers must complete the table below:
Contract year Maximum percentage increase
Year 2 ___ %
Year 3 ___ %
Optional extension year 4+5 ___ %
The tender with the accumulated lowest percentage cost increase over the potential 5 years will receive the maximum 5 marks. All other percentage increases will be scored proportionately. The percentage increase submitted must be fixed and must include all anticipated inflationary, salary, overhead, travel, administrative and other cost increases. No additional annual increase will be permitted unless expressly agreed by Careers Wales in writing.
Section 2: Quality and Technical Response
Please provide a response to the following:
1. Relevant experience of working in the public sector Maximum 500 words
Please describe your experience of providing internal audit services to public sector bodies of a similar size, complexity and governance environment. Your response should include examples of work with Welsh public sector, arm’s-length bodies, sponsored bodies, education, skills, careers, or advice-based organisations where relevant.
2. Team experience and continuity Maximum 500 words
Please provide details of the proposed audit team, including roles, qualifications, public sector experience, and arrangements for continuity of staff over the contract term.
3. Audit Planning and Risk Assessment Approach Maximum 500words
Please describe your approach to preparing a risk-based internal audit strategy and annual audit plan. Your response should explain how you would engage with senior management, the Audit and Risk Committee, external audit, and other assurance providers.
4. Compliance with Standards Maximum 500 words
Explain how your proposed service will comply with the Global Internal Audit Standards, the UK Public Sector Application Note, and any relevant public sector internal audit requirements. Please also explain how you will maintain independence, objectivity and professional standards throughout the contract.
5. Audit Methodology Maximum 500 words
Please describe your methodology for delivering individual internal audit reviews, from scoping through to fieldwork, reporting, agreement of actions and follow-up. Please include how you ensure findings are evidence-based, proportionate and useful to management.
6. Sustainability Maximum 500 words
Careers Wales expects suppliers to support sustainable development, social value, fair work and environmentally responsible procurement. Tenderers should explain how these principles are embedded within their organisation and how they will be reflected in delivery of the internal audit service, including travel, digital working, workforce practices and engagement with Careers Wales.
7. Welsh language and bilingual service provision maximum 500 words
Please describe how you would support Welsh language requirements in the delivery of internal audit services, including communication, reporting, meetings and engagement with staff where required.
8. Added Value and advisory support maximum 500 words
Please explain how your internal audit service will provide added value beyond compliance testing. Include examples of how you have helped public sector clients improve governance, risk management, controls, efficiency or value for money.
Submission Details
Section A: Price 30%
The tender will be scored on price as follows:
"Price score"="lowest compliant tender price" /"tenderer’s price" ×30
Example:
Tenderer Price Formula Price score
A £80,000 £80,000 / £80,000 × 30 30.00
B £90,000 £80,000 / £90,000 × 30 26.67
C £100,000 £80,000 / £100,000 × 30
24.00
Section B: Quality 70%
The following marks are allocated to each section:
Relevant experience of working in the public sector 15%
Team experience and continuity 10%
Audit Planning and Risk Assessment Approach 10%
Compliance with Standards 5%
Audit Methodology 10%
Sustainability 10%
Welsh language and bilingual service provision 5%
Added Value and advisory support 5%
The tender will be awarded to the company achieving the highest score out of a maximum 100%.
The scoring methodology
Score Rating Description
5 Excellent The response fully meets the requirement and provides a comprehensive, well-evidenced answer. It demonstrates strong understanding, relevant experience, a clear methodology, realistic delivery proposals and added value. No material weaknesses are identified.
4 Good The response meets the requirement well and provides a clear and credible answer. It includes relevant evidence and demonstrates good understanding, although there may be minor gaps or areas where further detail would have strengthened the response.
3 Acceptable The response meets the core requirement and is broadly adequate. It provides some relevant evidence, but lacks detail, depth, clarity or specific examples in some areas.
2 Weak The response only partially meets the requirement. It contains limited evidence, lacks sufficient detail, or raises concerns about the tenderer’s ability to deliver the requirement effectively.
1 Poor The response is significantly deficient. It provides very little relevant evidence, does not adequately address the requirement, or gives rise to significant concerns.
0 Unacceptable / non-compliant No response is provided, or the response fails to address the requirement, is non-compliant, or is incapable of evaluation.
For each quality question, the score awarded will be converted into weighted marks using the following formula:
"Weighted mark"="score awarded" /5×"marks available for that question"
For example, if a question is worth 10 marks and a tenderer scores 4 out of 5, the weighted mark would be:
4/5×10=8
|