Minimum standards and qualification required
The following timescales and targets shall apply to this Procurement Process:
Activity Date / time
Issue of Contract Notice 05.01.2022
Deadline for submission of responses by potential bidder 17.01.2022
Proposals evaluated 20.01.2022
Contract Award date 20.01.2022
Contract start date 21.01.2022
Outputs:
• Draft Toolkit 28.02.2022
• Draft Methodology 28.02.2022
• Draft Roadmap 28.02.2022
Contract end date 26.03 2022
Evaluation Criteria
Tender responses will be evaluated as set out below:
• The tender responses will be checked to ensure that they have been completed correctly and all necessary information has been provided. The evaluation panel will consist of 1 member of NLW staff; 2 ARCW Officers; 1 member of The Federation of Museums and Art Galleries of Wales; 1 member of The Wales Higher Education and Libraries Forum; 1 representative from Welsh Government; and the ARCW Business and Training Manager.
• Responses from potential bidders will be assessed using the following criteria and weightings, based entirely on the responses submitted:
CRITERIA
WEIGHTING (%)
Previous Experience 30%
Project Management and Methodology
50%
Commercial
20%
Previous Experience (30%)
Previous experience of creating
• guidance and strategies to support the heritage and / or cultural sectors in their work with diverse communities
• methodologies for locating and searching heritage collections for relevant collection materials
Project Management and Methodology (50%)
Clear demonstration of
• the guiding principles and processes for managing the project
• compliance to tender specification
• quality
• delivery date, delivery period and period of completion
Commercial (30%)
• Value for money
• The evaluation panel appointed for this procurement will meet to agree and moderate scores for each award criteria. Final scores in terms of a percentage of the overall tender score will be obtained by applying the relevant weighting factors set out as part of the award criteria table above. The percentage scores for each award criteria will be amalgamated to give a percentage score out of 100.
• Scoring Model:
10 – Excellent: has provided a detailed response that meets all aspects of the requirement.
7 – Good: the response provides evidence as requested but fails to provide the level of detail required.
5 – Adequate: meets the requirement, but not all of the areas of evidence requested have been provided.
3 – Poor: does not demonstrate that requirement is met in one or more areas.
0 – Unacceptable: no response has been provided.
• The winning tender response shall be the tender response scoring the highest percentage scores out of 100 when applying the above evaluation methodology.
Welsh Language Standards
In accordance with Welsh Language Standards:
• You are welcome to submit your tender in English or Welsh.
• A tender submitted in Welsh will not be treated less favourably than a tender submitted in English.
|